Compare Monocrystalline And Polycrystalline Solar Panels

Polycrystalline solar panels are cheaper than monocrystalline panels however they are less efficient and aren t as aesthetically pleasing.

Compare monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels.

When you compare the initial installation costs between monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline panels have about 13 to 16 efficiency while monocrystalline panels have an efficiency rate of anywhere from 15 to 20. Monocrystalline solar panels appear to be quite expensive when compared to polycrystalline panels. Monocrystalline solar panel manufacturers will usually offer a 25 year warranty because of the longer lifespan of the product.

The main difference between the two technologies is the type of silicon solar cell they use. You would need a much larger array of polycrystalline panels to produce the same amount of energy than if you used monocrystalline which may not work for households with limited roof space. Polycrystalline solar panels you should also look at the average lifespan of each. The price of a monocrystalline panel ranges from 200 to 300 which mainly depends on the quality and size of a solar panel.

Monocrystalline solar panels contain cells that are cut from a single crystalline silicon ingot. Manufacturers use silicon in making solar panels. As a result mono panels are slightly more efficient than poly panels. Monocrystalline solar panels are highly efficient and have a sleek design but come at a higher price point than other solar panels.

Monocrystalline solar panels have solar cells made from a single crystal of silicon while polycrystalline solar panels have solar cells made from many silicon fragments melted together.